Understanding Collusion in Mythical Horse Racing Tournaments

Questions occasionally arise regarding family members, spouses, or friends participating in the same tournament. Because HorseTourneys takes contest integrity seriously, we believe it is important to explain how these situations are evaluated.

We understand why players are concerned about related participants competing in the same contest. Integrity is important, and no player wants to feel that someone else has an unfair advantage.

First, it is important to distinguish between multiple participation and coordinated play.

In a typical mythical tournament, participants are selecting horses across 10–12 races. Even using conservative assumptions, the number of possible outcome combinations can run into the hundreds of millions or billions.

For example, consider a mythical tournament with 10 races. If each race contains only eight betting interests, there are more than one billion possible winner combinations.

Two separate entries can cover two of those possible paths. Ten entries can cover ten. Additional coverage also requires additional paid entries.

As a result, the participation of a small number of related individuals does not, by itself, create the kind of meaningful competitive leverage that is sometimes assumed. This distinction is important.

A spouse, family member, or friend legitimately participating with his or her own entry is not inherently receiving an unfair advantage simply because of the relationship between the players. As with all participants, however, each player must independently control his or her account and independently make contest selections.

HorseTourneys therefore distinguishes between relationships among participants and actual coordination of contest play.

We monitor contest activity for indications of coordinated selections, common control of entries, circumvention of entry limits, and other conduct that could compromise contest integrity. These matters are addressed under our Official Rules.

Similarity among selections, or participation by related individuals, does not by itself establish collusion. Horse racing tournaments naturally produce overlap among players who may identify the same logical contenders or employ similar handicapping strategies.

Our goal is simple: maintain a fair and competitive environment while focusing enforcement on conduct that actually compromises—or attempts to compromise—the independent nature and integrity of tournament play.

McKay Smith is the President of HorseTourneys

Leave a comment